<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TrueJournals &#187; movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truejournals.com/tags/movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truejournals.com</link>
	<description>College student; Engineer; Programmer; Nerd.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Explaining Inception</title>
		<link>http://truejournals.com/2010/07/17/explaining-inception/</link>
		<comments>http://truejournals.com/2010/07/17/explaining-inception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TrueJournals</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truejournals.com/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After first hearing about the movie Inception, directed by Christopher Nolan, the movie seemed&#8230; strange.  It was as movie that I knew I would have to see when it came out.  A movie that toyed with your mind.  Exactly my kind of movie!  I would group it in the same category of movies such as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After first hearing about the movie Inception, directed by Christopher Nolan, the movie seemed&#8230; strange.  It was as movie that I knew I would have to see when it came out.  A movie that toyed with your mind.  Exactly my kind of movie!  I would group it in the same category of movies such as Memento, Donnie Darko, Primer, and Shutter Island.  Confusing, but all fully explainable if you can piece everything together.</p>
<p>Eventually, I decided it would be fun to go see Inception at the midnight premier.   The only other movies I&#8217;ve seen at their midnight premiers are Harry Potter 6, and Avatar.  Both were just awesome movie-going experiences.  If you&#8217;ve never seen a movie at midnight, it&#8217;s really something you should try once.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m glad I went to see Inception, because it really is a great movie!  The problem is&#8230; seeing it so early left me no one to discuss it with.  So, I&#8217;ve been scouring the Internet for opinions and discussions.  After reading quite a bit, and fueled by inspiration from <a class="vt-p" href="http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Inception-Explained-Unraveling-The-Dream-Within-The-Dream-19615.html" target="_blank">an article on CinemaBlend</a>, I&#8217;ve decided to write my own small FAQ for the movie Inception.</p>
<p><strong>DISCLAIMER:</strong> This article contains <strong>major</strong> spoilers.  <strong>Please, please, please</strong> do not read this until you&#8217;ve seen Inception.  The film is very enjoyable if you go in with an open mind.  Reading too much about it before seeing it could kill the whole experience.<span id="more-201"></span></p>
<p><strong>What is limbo?</strong><br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">This seems to be a very confusing point.  I can&#8217;t claim the view I hold as my own, because I read it somewhere, but I don&#8217;t remember where, so I can&#8217;t give credit.  Let&#8217;s make this clear, though: limbo is not a description of a <strong>place.</strong> Limbo is a description of <strong>a state of mind</strong>.  Limbo is where your mind goes when you forget that you&#8217;re dreaming.  For most of us, this is the normal dream world (kind of).  You brain enters limbo when you, for example, die within a dream within a dream, you forget you&#8217;re dreaming, so your brain enters limbo.  Because you died, you expect to go back to reality, but really, there&#8217;s another layer of dream left, so you get stuck in limbo.</span></p>
<p><strong>How does your brain get &#8220;burnt out&#8221; in limbo?</strong><br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">This is a tricky one, and I hope I&#8217;m getting it right.  You can only get burnt out by coming back to reality.  The problem is that your brain thinks you&#8217;ve experienced many, many years, while in reality, you&#8217;ve only experienced a couple hours.  The sudden realization that you&#8217;re not old can cause your brain to get confused and &#8220;burn out&#8221;.</span></p>
<p><strong>How did Saito get to limbo?</strong><br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">Saito was shot in level 1, the van, but </span>died in level 3, the snow fort.  So, his brain got stuck in limbo, where he lived until he became an old man and Cobb rescued him.</p>
<p><strong>In the end &#8212; dream world, or not?</strong><br />
<span style="font-weight: normal;">This is the trickiest question of the movie, and I really do believe it&#8217;s up to individual beliefs.  However, let me attempt to explain my viewing of the movie.  In the end, Cobb is in limbo, meaning he is still in the dream world.  I think that when he was put under the first time by the chemist, in order to test the formula, we never actually saw him wake up.  Evidence:</span></p>
<ul>
<li>After this, we never actually see the top fall once spun.  Right away, Cobb tries to spin the top, but it&#8217;s knocked off the table, so Cobb can&#8217;t finish his test.</li>
<li>Cobb&#8217;s children at the end are the same age as in his mind.  Cobb has been gone for quite a while.  Shouldn&#8217;t his children have aged at least a bit?  At the young age they are, even a couple months should show a difference in appearance.</li>
</ul>
<p>Just to be fair, though, here&#8217;s some evidence against this theory:</p>
<ul>
<li>Cobb never seems Mal unless we see him go into a dream.  <strong>Refute: </strong>perhaps Mal only appears once he&#8217;s two layers into the dream world.  Or perhaps his subconscious just doesn&#8217;t let her interfere.</li>
<li>Cobb isn&#8217;t wearing a wedding ring at the end of the movie.  If you pay attention carefully, Cobb is always wearing his wedding ring when he&#8217;s in the dream world.  At the end of the movie, however, Cobb&#8217;s wedding ring is absent.  <strong>Refute:</strong> this could be a product of Cobb accepting his wife&#8217;s death.  Even though he&#8217;s still in limbo, she&#8217;s no longer bothering his subconscious</li>
<li>We see the top wobble a bit at the end.  <strong>Refute: </strong>kind of hard to say on this one.  Although, there are some that claim the top didn&#8217;t wobble.  It was very subtle.  I think that even in the dream world, the top wobbles while it&#8217;s spinning forever.  We just didn&#8217;t see it long enough to balance itself out.</li>
</ul>
<p>And that&#8217;s all I&#8217;ve got for now.  Something else confuse you?  Let me know, I&#8217;ll see if I can answer it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truejournals.com/2010/07/17/explaining-inception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Was Wrong!</title>
		<link>http://truejournals.com/2010/03/16/i-was-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://truejournals.com/2010/03/16/i-was-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TrueJournals</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truejournals.com/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meant to post this earlier.  Just a small post to admit that I was wrong in my prediction of best picture.  If you watched the Oscars, or have talked to someone who watched the Oscars, you probably know that The Hurt Locker won best picture.  This is slightly surprising.  At its peak, The Hurt Locker [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meant to post this earlier.  Just a small post to admit that I was wrong in my prediction of best picture.  If you watched the Oscars, or have talked to someone who watched the Oscars, you probably know that <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Hurt Locker</span> won best picture.  This is slightly surprising.  At its peak, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Hurt Locker</span> was in a mere 323 theaters.  Compare that to a major picture like <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Avatar</span>, which had a peak of 3,461 theaters.  That&#8217;s over 10x the number of theaters.  Not that this number should, or does, matter, but a film with such a small release is a surprising pick for best picture.</p>
<p>Another interesting fact about <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Hurt Locker</span> is that it is the lowest grossing movie to ever win the title.  The current estimated gross is about $16 million.  Although, the low gross of the movie could be, in part, due to the limited release of the film.  Again, this isn&#8217;t something that should, or does, matter, it&#8217;s just an interesting tidbit.</p>
<p>One final note on <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Hurt Locker</span>.  The director of <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Hurt Locker</span> is Kathryn Bigelow, one of James Cameron&#8217;s ex-wives.  Apparently, Kathryn Bigelow was debating on whether or not she should actually direct the film.  So, she called her good friend James Cameron, and he convinced her to do the movie.  It&#8217;s quite possible that if <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Hurt Locker</span> had not been in the running for best picture, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Avatar</span> might have one (although, history isn&#8217;t on <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Avatar</span>&#8216;s side, read <a title="Who Will Win Best Picture?" href="http://truejournals.com/2010/02/19/who-will-win-best-picture/" target="_blank">my previous post</a>).  James Cameron, however, has said that he really liked <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Hurt Locker</span>, and even voted for it to win best picture, instead of <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Avatar</span>.</p>
<p>So, there&#8217;s a blog post that&#8217;s about a week overdue.  Now, on to write a more technical blog post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truejournals.com/2010/03/16/i-was-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Will Win Best Picture?</title>
		<link>http://truejournals.com/2010/02/19/who-will-win-best-picture/</link>
		<comments>http://truejournals.com/2010/02/19/who-will-win-best-picture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 03:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TrueJournals</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[best picture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truejournals.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it&#8217;s that time of year again!  That&#8217;s right, it&#8217;s Oscar season.  Since all the nominees were announced a little while ago, and we have 15 short days left until the Oscars, about now is the time when everyone makes their predictions and tries to tell us who is going to win each award.  Of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s that time of year again!  That&#8217;s right, it&#8217;s Oscar season.  Since all the nominees were announced a little while ago, and we have 15 short days left until the Oscars, about now is the time when everyone makes their predictions and tries to tell us who is going to win each award.  Of course, we can&#8217;t know for certain who will actually win until the winners are announced, but&#8230; if you can&#8217;t beat &#8216;em, join &#8216;em!</p>
<p>So, while I don&#8217;t think of myself as much of a movie critic, and I haven&#8217;t even seen all 10 best picture nominees myself, I&#8217;m still going to attempt to throw my prediction for who will win best picture at the Oscars this year.  Last year, I went to AMC&#8217;s &#8220;Best Picture Showcase&#8221;, and was able to see all five best picture nominees.  This year, while AMC is running the event again, I won&#8217;t be able to attend.  So, I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ll ever get the chance to see all ten nominees, but I&#8217;m going to attempt to have an opinion about all the movies anyway.</p>
<p>Before I start, I should note that I am disappointed at the Oscars this year.  Having ten movies get nominated instead of the normal five does not &#8220;open the field&#8221;.  Instead, it just removes from the title of &#8220;best picture nominee&#8221;.  Even if a movie doesn&#8217;t win the award, it usually still gets bragging rights that it was one of the five best pictures of the year.  However, being in the top ten, while still impressive, is less of a title.  By attempting to give films more credit, they have actually removed the credit from the films that actually deserve it.</p>
<p>Anyway, the list of the ten nominations is as follows:<br />
<span id="more-177"></span></p>
<ol>
<li>Avatar</li>
<li>The Blind Side</li>
<li>District 9</li>
<li>An Education</li>
<li>The Hurt Locker</li>
<li>Inglourious Basterds</li>
<li>Precious</li>
<li>A Serious Man</li>
<li>Up</li>
<li>Up in the Air</li>
</ol>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s look at what the list actually consists of.  For starters, we see a few rarities on the list: two Sci-Fi movies and an animated feature stick out.  Generally, these two types of movies are left behind by the Oscars, because they lack the mass appeal of the other genres (drama is a favorite).  Which is stupid: there are plenty of Sci-Fi movies or animated films that are better than other genres.  Many people were disappointed at last year&#8217;s nominees because &#8220;WALL-E&#8221; wasn&#8217;t nominated.  It seems that, with the presence of &#8220;Up&#8221;, the Oscars are trying to &#8220;make up&#8221; for that.  However, at the same time, it can be seen as the only reason that Sci-Fi and animated films have snuck on to the list is due to expanding the list to ten movies, instead of the usual five.</p>
<p>So, who will win?  A lot of people are thinking that, with the momentum of its best motion picture win at the Golden Globe awards, <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Avatar</span> is a big contender.  As much as I loved the movie <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Avatar</span> (just search my blog for &#8220;Avatar&#8221; &#8212; I loved it), I doubt it will win Best Picture.  I would LIKE for it to win Best Picture, but I&#8217;ll be sightly surprised if it actually happens.  As previously stated, the Academy just doesn&#8217;t seem to like Sci-Fi movies, and <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Avatar</span> falls under that category, and I have to wonder if it would even be on the list if they had stuck to only five nominations, instead of changing it to ten.</p>
<p>The same goes for <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Up</span>.  It was a great film, but I find it hard to believe that it actually has a chance at winning best picture.  With <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Up</span>, the Academy also has to fear losing its actors: animated films require only <strong>voice </strong>actors.  Part of the goal of the academy is to keep actors with jobs, and giving <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Up</span> the title of &#8220;best picture&#8221; would lead to more animated films, and less jobs for &#8220;body actors&#8221;.</p>
<p>Finally, I&#8217;ll lump <span style="text-decoration: underline;">District 9</span> into this whole &#8220;won&#8217;t win&#8221; category.  Again, it was a great film, but I just don&#8217;t see it winning best picture.  I also kind of worry that if a Sci-Fi film wins best picture, we&#8217;ll see directors flooding to the genre, and attempting to bring more people into the fan base.  The fact remains that Sci-Fi is not a genre for everyone, and <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Avatar</span> is the first movie I&#8217;ve heard people who normally don&#8217;t like Sci-Fi say they like.  So, if a Sci-Fi or animated film is going to win Best Picture, it&#8217;s going to be <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Avatar</span>.</p>
<p>Since this won&#8217;t happen, what do we have left?  Well, out of the seven left, I&#8217;ve only actually seen <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Blind Side</span>.  But, once again, that won&#8217;t stop me from making a decision!  I also find it hard to believe that <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Blind Side</span> will actually win.  I don&#8217;t think it was a bad movie, I just don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s &#8220;Best Picture&#8221;-worthy.</p>
<p>Out of those remaining, my vote goes to either <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Up in the Air</span>, or <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Hurt Locker</span>, and out of those two, I would choose <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Up in the Air</span>.  One by one: <span style="text-decoration: underline;">An Education</span> sounds a little like <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Reader</span> kind of, not really, and it just seems like a movie that won&#8217;t win; <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Inglourious Basterds</span> is, from what I understand, a comedy about Nazis&#8230; no offense to anyone, but I just don&#8217;t see that winning best picture; <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Precious</span> is based on a novel, and, in my opinion, the best picture winner has to be something original; <span style="text-decoration: underline;">A Serious Man</span> is described on IMDB as &#8220;A dark comedy&#8221;&#8230; say no more, it&#8217;s not going to win.</p>
<p>Why not <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Hurt Locker</span>?  It&#8217;s about the war in Iraq, and that can be a touchy subject.  Again, I haven&#8217;t seen it, but I just have a feeling that <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Up in the Air</span> has more of a chance than <span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Hurt Locker</span>.</p>
<p>Writing all this gives me an idea: &#8220;The Uninformed Critic&#8221; &#8212; writing movie reviews based on what I can find out about them through IMDB and Wikipedia.  Has anyone done this yet?  I might need to start a new series of posts here&#8230; We&#8217;ll see how that goes&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, to wrap up, my prediction for Best Picture nominee is <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Up in the Air</span>.  We&#8217;ll see how I do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truejournals.com/2010/02/19/who-will-win-best-picture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You MUST See Avatar</title>
		<link>http://truejournals.com/2010/01/09/why-you-must-see-avatar/</link>
		<comments>http://truejournals.com/2010/01/09/why-you-must-see-avatar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 21:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TrueJournals</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truejournals.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the time of this writing, I have seen Avatar three times: twice in IMAX, and once in RealD 3D.  The first time was for the midnight premier in IMAX.  Then, I decided I wanted to see it again, so got a bunch of people to go see it in IMAX.  The third time, a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the time of this writing, I have seen <em>Avatar</em> three times: twice in IMAX, and once in RealD 3D.  The first time was for the midnight premier in IMAX.  Then, I decided I wanted to see it again, so got a bunch of people to go see it in IMAX.  The third time, a couple people I knew were going, and I wanted to see the movie a third time.  I&#8217;m contemplating going to see it a fourth time.</p>
<p>Now, after reading this article and seeing the movie, you may feel the movie isn&#8217;t good enough to see it three or four times, and that&#8217;s fine.  But if you go see the movie and think it was bad, then I think you&#8217;re just looking for something to complain about, so you found something.  The only people I&#8217;ve heard of not liking this movie are comments I&#8217;ve read online.  Every person I actually <strong>know</strong> that saw it thought it was a fantastic movie.</p>
<p>But, really&#8230; Why should you go see <em>Avatar</em>?</p>
<h3>1. The plot line</h3>
<p>This is the complaint I see most often, so I&#8217;m going to address it before anything else.  I&#8217;m also fairly certain that this complaint comes mostly from people who <strong>haven&#8217;t</strong> seen the movie.  I&#8217;m not going to argue that the plot isn&#8217;t cliché, because&#8230; well, it really is.  But, that&#8217;s a terrible reason to not see a movie.  First off, if the only complaint you can find about a movie is that the plot line/story has been done before, then I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s a pretty damn good movie. Overall, the basic plot line has little to do with whether a movie is good or not.  Let&#8217;s face it: almost all movies have a clichéd basic plot line.  The reason you like a movie is how the plot line plays out: character development, how the end is reached, tests that characters have to go through, etc.  Most people would rather see a story they already know because it&#8217;s less confusing, and less to follow.  You know what&#8217;s going on, you just have to sit there and go along for the ride.<span id="more-142"></span></p>
<h3>2. Cutting Edge Animation</h3>
<p>Seriously, the graphics are like nothing you&#8217;ve seen before.  I&#8217;ve heard one person say, after seeing <em>Avatar</em>, that it was &#8220;a pretty good cartoon,&#8221; and I&#8217;m still convinced that we didn&#8217;t watch the same movie (it should also be noted that this person complains about <strong>everything</strong>).  However, remember to not get caught up in the graphics.  If you keep saying to yourself, &#8220;Wow&#8230; these graphics are amazing,&#8221; then you&#8217;re missing the magic of the movie.  Although, at the same time, the graphics are so amazing that you do have to convince yourself every now and then that the Na&#8217;vi, the Thanator, and the Hallelujah Mountains are <strong>not</strong> real.  The previews/commercials do NOT do the movie justice.  In the previews, the Na&#8217;vi do have a unreal feeling to them, but this is not so in the movie.</p>
<h3>3. 3D</h3>
<p>Again, this is a revolution in film making.  The 3D in the movie is amazing, and used as a tool to immerse you into the world, instead of being used as a gimmick to have things pop out at you.  Most of the movie happens deeper into the screen, instead of outside of it.  <em>Avatar</em> is also the first movie to be <strong>filmed</strong> entirely in 3D.  All other movies have either only had parts filmed in 3D, or just done 3D in post-processing.  The 3D experience is amazing, cutting-edge, and greatly enhances the way you are immersed in the movie.</p>
<h3>4. The Amount of Work</h3>
<p>You should go see it just to see what James Cameron has devoted his whole career to.  <em>Avatar</em> has been the movie he&#8217;s wanted to make since he became a director, and the technology finally caught up with him.  No detail is spared in the movie.  The Na&#8217;vi language was specially crafted with the help of a linguist, and the details in the plants are stunning.  From bio-luminescence to giant flying banshees (each unique in some way), there is not a single pixel out of place.  Everything on Pandora has a purpose for being there, and the amount of detail put into the movie is incredible.</p>
<h3>5. The Final Battle</h3>
<p>The final battle scene is just plain awesome.  The last ~30 minutes of the movie is just this insane battle between the humans and the Na&#8217;vi, and it plays out beautifully.  Explosions galore, but everything is cut together so you know which character is where.  Girls will love <em>Avatar</em> for its love story, and guys will love <em>Avatar</em> for the battle scenes.  Seriously&#8230; it&#8217;s awesome.</p>
<p>Overall, it&#8217;s a wonderful movie that I&#8217;ve only heard good things about from my friends (and I&#8217;ve only been able to tell others good things)!  So&#8230; if you haven&#8217;t yet seen <em>Avatar</em>, you should go see it now.  And, make sure you go see it in 3D, or you&#8217;re missing out on the best part of the movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://truejournals.com/2010/01/09/why-you-must-see-avatar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

