By: Ben

Ben — Thu, 28 May 2009 02:02:44 +0000

Re your point on science and religion.Ligere in Latin to tie a knot – re-ligere-> linked understanding
religere = religion
So today’s religion or linked understanding should be ans is de facto Science – not just test-tubes but all knowledge.

By: Ben

Ben — Thu, 28 May 2009 01:33:27 +0000

There is a revolutionary theory in Intelligent Design message from the Designers.Essentially this is about the demystifying of the old understandings, including Darwin for the origins of our humanity. There have been many humanities on this very ancient planet, that have disappeared for the self-evident reasons we can see all around us today.Here we have a sensible explanation for all the world religions and at the same time a logical reason for the appearance of the ufo phenomenon over the millennia and especially since 1945 – The oh my god the kids have found the matches stage with our particular humanity. I feel it is of some importance to at least begin to consider this theory, particularly in the growing urgency of the predictions it makes.All the world’s religions contain traces of evidence,and of these Buddhism is the nearest the truthwithout the mysticism.That said the Bible could be said to contain the scientific key to understanding this theory and for that matter to the current ufo debate.This requires a multi-disciplinary approach where one has to look at both the many branches of modern science, History archaeology geology and the world religions, together with a useful knowledge of issues like the world population environment and the dangers of nuclear war, particularly today with the proliferation of nuclear weapons. So at last we have a framework where we can consider many issues at the same time. We can respect the old understandings without living in the past. I think there has to be made a distinction between these scientific creators and the concept of Infinity.Contrary to current understanding the universe is infinite.and always was and always will be. Human beings are like tiny pieces of infinity growing conscious of themselves. So we can elevate the concept of ‘God’ to that of the infinite, which through meditation we can seek to balance our infinite imaginations with our relatively small powers of perception, and thereby be in harmony with the infinite.As Einstein said ‘ imagination is more important than knowledge.One needs to couple a certain degree of both technical and spiritual humility to even begin to understand the implications of this enormous and all embracing theory.These scientists have proven that within the sub atomic particles of atoms are billions of galaxies with solar systems and people every bit as advanced as we are and likewise our galaxy is one of billions inside an enormous atom, which in turn is part of another being and so on.All that is above is below, as our scientists are gradually and progressively beginning to discover. As one famous person said, if this is science-fiction then it ranks alongside the most breath-taking of it’s kind, but if it is true it is earth-shaking’. I would add if this is science-fiction, then within the context of this theory, so are the dangers of nuclear war and over-popualtion and for that matter the subject of Ufos. What this amounts to is the demystification of the old understandings, an incorporation of the framework of Darwin’s theory and the spiritualisation of science. Our scientists are soon to become ‘creators’ of life through sythesis of DNA. They will through the progression of design create increasingly complicated organisms, and if our humanity is lucky enough to survive , eventually create ‘man in their own image.Scientists, will then become like those our ancestors, mistook for god/gods and the buckle will once again be closed. The sooner the scientific community wakes up to this theory the better, that is unless debating our origins is more important than the survival of our humanity. I believe our humanity will ultimately be wise enough to avoid an unfortuante out-come, providing we start to put aside our relatively trivial difference and start to behave as a family and understand this theory.

Comments on: Science “vs.” Religion

By: Ben

By: Ben